The JI
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     
 


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Anderson, M. W.
Right arrow Articles by Gorski, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Anderson, M. W.
Right arrow Articles by Gorski, J.
The Journal of Immunology, 2003, 171: 5683-5687.
Copyright © 2003 by The American Association of Immunologists


CUTTING EDGE

Cutting Edge: TCR Contacts as Anchors: Effects on Affinity and HLA-DM Stability 1

Matthew W. Anderson and Jack Gorski2

Blood Research Institute, Blood Center of Southeastern Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI 53201; and Department of Microbiology and Molecular Genetics, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI 53201

Peptides presented via the class II MHC (MHCII) pathway are selected based on affinity for MHCII and stability in the presence of HLA-DM. Currently, epitope selection is thought to be controlled by the ability of peptide to sequester "anchor" residues into pockets in the MHCII. Residues exhibiting higher levels of solvent accessibility have been shown to contact TCR, but their roles in affinity and complex stability have not been directly studied. Using the HLA-DR1-binding influenza peptide, hemagglutinin (306–318), as a model, we show that side chain substitutions at these positions influence affinity and HLA-DM stability. Multiple substitutions reduce affinity to a greater extent than the loss of the major P1 anchor residue. We propose that these effects may be mediated through the H-bond network. These results demonstrate the importance of solvent-exposed residues in epitope selection and blur the distinctions between anchor and TCR contact residues.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
A. Ferrante and J. Gorski
Cooperativity of Hydrophobic Anchor Interactions: Evidence for Epitope Selection by MHC Class II as a Folding Process
J. Immunol., June 1, 2007; 178(11): 7181 - 7189.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JEMHome page
C. A. Lazarski, F. A. Chaves, and A. J. Sant
The impact of DM on MHC class II-restricted antigen presentation can be altered by manipulation of MHC-peptide kinetic stability
J. Exp. Med., May 15, 2006; 203(5): 1319 - 1328.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
T. K. Baxter, S. J. Gagnon, R. L. Davis-Harrison, J. C. Beck, A.-K. Binz, R. V. Turner, W. E. Biddison, and B. M. Baker
Strategic Mutations in the Class I Major Histocompatibility Complex HLA-A2 Independently Affect Both Peptide Binding and T Cell Receptor Recognition
J. Biol. Chem., July 9, 2004; 279(28): 29175 - 29184.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
This Website Copyright © 2003 by The American Association of Immunologists, Inc. All rights reserved.
All Contents Copyright © 2003 by The American Association of Immunologists, Inc. All rights reserved.