The JI
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     
 

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Tenner, A. J.
Right arrow Articles by Frank, M. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Tenner, A. J.
Right arrow Articles by Frank, M. M.

The Journal of Immunology, Vol 137, Issue 2 625-630, Copyright © 1986 by American Association of Immunologists

ARTICLES

Activator-bound C1 is less susceptible to inactivation by C1 inhibition than is fluid-phase C1

AJ Tenner and MM Frank

Parameters that influence the effective interaction of C1 with the serum regulatory glycoprotein C1 Inhibitor were investigated. C1 that bound to activator particles EAC4 or EA was strikingly less susceptible to inactivation by C1 Inhibitor than was fluid-phase C1. By using the conventional hemolytic assay, the concentrations of C1 Inhibitor required for inhibition of C1 bound to EAC4 were 1000-fold higher than those required for fluid-phase C1. With EA as the activator (and indicator) particle, 17- to 75-fold higher concentrations of C1 Inhibitor were required to inhibit bound vs free C1. These findings suggest that, on binding to these particulate immune complexes, the domain of the C1 molecule capable of interacting with C1 Inhibitor is less available for binding than when C1 is in fluid phase. Alternatively, the conformation of C1 may be altered when bound to EA or EAC4, resulting in a lower association constant of C1 Inhibitor for C1. As assessed by inhibition of classical complement pathway hemolysis, the inhibition of the enzymatic activity of C1 by C1 Inhibitor (both in the fluid phase and particle-bound) was markedly dependent on the concentration of the reactants. Incubation of C1 and C1 Inhibitor at serum concentrations resulted in the inhibition of more than 10 times the amount of C1 hemolytic activity than that which occurred when the same ratio of components was incubated at the more dilute concentrations used in the conventional hemolytic assays. These findings have allowed for the development of a more sensitive and rapid assay for C1 Inhibitor function.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 BloodHome page
J. L. Teeling, R. R. French, M. S. Cragg, J. van den Brakel, M. Pluyter, H. Huang, C. Chan, P. W. H. I. Parren, C. E. Hack, M. Dechant, et al.
Characterization of new human CD20 monoclonal antibodies with potent cytolytic activity against non-Hodgkin lymphomas
Blood, September 15, 2004; 104(6): 1793 - 1800.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
This Website Copyright © 1986 by The American Association of Immunologists, Inc. All rights reserved.
All Contents Copyright © 1986 by The American Association of Immunologists, Inc. All rights reserved.